Demographics details for Stillwater, OK vs Manhattan, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stillwater, OK vs Manhattan, KS.
| Data | Stillwater | Manhattan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 49,160 | 53,829 |
| Median Age | 23.4 years | 24.7 years |
| Median Income | $39,998 | $55,316 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Stillwater vs Manhattan
- The population in Manhattan is higher at 53,829, compared to 49,160 in Stillwater.
- The median age in Manhattan is higher at 24.7 years, compared to 23.4 years in Stillwater.
- Manhattan has a higher median income of $55,316, compared to $39,998 in Stillwater.
- In Manhattan, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 25.0% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Manhattan.
- The unemployment rate in Stillwater is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.8% in Manhattan.
Demographics
Demographics Stillwater vs Manhattan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stillwater | Manhattan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 5 |
| White | 72 | 74 |
| Asian | 6 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 7 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Stillwater vs Manhattan
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Stillwater and Manhattan at 5%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Manhattan at 74% compared to 72% in Stillwater.
- The Asian population is larger in Stillwater at 6% compared to 5% in Manhattan.
- Manhattan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Stillwater at 9% compared to 7% in Manhattan.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Stillwater at 3% compared to 1% in Manhattan.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stillwater | Manhattan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 26.1% | 20.2% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 16.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 20.6% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 32.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stillwater vs Manhattan
- More residents in Stillwater report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.7% in Manhattan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stillwater at 26.1% compared to 20.2% in Manhattan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stillwater at 19.5% compared to 16.0% in Manhattan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Manhattan at 20.6% compared to 13.6% in Stillwater.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stillwater at 42.0% compared to 32.2% in Manhattan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Manhattan at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Stillwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stillwater | Manhattan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (239) | 0.5% (256) |
| High School Diploma | 6.5% (3,199) | 5.8% (3,138) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (1,910) | 4.2% (2,256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.5% (11,068) | 26.0% (14,017) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stillwater vs Manhattan
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Stillwater and Manhattan at 0.5%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater hold a high school diploma at 6.5% compared to 5.8% in Manhattan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Manhattan at 4.2%, compared to 3.9% in Stillwater.
- In Manhattan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.0% compared to 22.5% in Stillwater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.