Demographics details for Stillwater, OK vs Keyser, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stillwater, OK vs Keyser, WV.
| Data | Stillwater | Keyser |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 49,160 | 4,849 |
| Median Age | 23.4 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $39,998 | $46,724 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Stillwater vs Keyser
- In Stillwater, the population is higher at 49,160, compared to 4,849 in Keyser.
- The median age in Keyser is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 23.4 years in Stillwater.
- Keyser has a higher median income of $46,724, compared to $39,998 in Stillwater.
- In Keyser, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 25.0% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Keyser.
- Keyser has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
Demographics
Demographics Stillwater vs Keyser provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stillwater | Keyser |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 4 |
| White | 72 | 95 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 1 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stillwater vs Keyser
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stillwater at 5% compared to 4% in Keyser.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Keyser at 95% compared to 72% in Stillwater.
- The Asian population is larger in Stillwater at 6% compared to 0% in Keyser.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Stillwater at 5% compared to 0% in Keyser.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Stillwater at 9% compared to 1% in Keyser.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Stillwater at 3% compared to 0% in Keyser.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stillwater | Keyser |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 26.1% | 27.3% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 35.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stillwater vs Keyser
- In Keyser, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 19.1% in Stillwater.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Keyser at 27.3% versus 26.1% in Stillwater.
- Keyser has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 19.5% in Stillwater.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Keyser at 14.4% compared to 13.6% in Stillwater.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stillwater at 42.0% compared to 35.3% in Keyser.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Keyser at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Stillwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stillwater | Keyser |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (239) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 6.5% (3,199) | 22.3% (1,081) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (1,910) | 15.1% (734) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.5% (11,068) | 18.8% (914) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stillwater vs Keyser
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Keyser.
- In Keyser, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 6.5% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Keyser at 15.1%, compared to 3.9% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 18.8% in Keyser.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.