Demographics details for Stillwater, MN vs Parker, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stillwater, MN vs Parker, CO.
| Data | Stillwater | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,276 | 61,222 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $107,986 | $126,615 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Stillwater vs Parker
- The population in Parker is higher at 61,222, compared to 19,276 in Stillwater.
- Residents in Stillwater have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 35.7 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $126,615, compared to $107,986 in Stillwater.
- In Parker, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 43.0% in Stillwater.
- The poverty level is identical in both Stillwater and Parker at 5%.
- Parker has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Stillwater.
Demographics
Demographics Stillwater vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stillwater | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 83 | 73 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stillwater vs Parker
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stillwater at 3% compared to 2% in Parker.
- Stillwater has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 73% in Parker.
- In Parker, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Stillwater.
- Parker has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 7% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Parker at 8%, compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stillwater and Parker at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stillwater | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 12.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 9.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.5% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 23.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stillwater vs Parker
- More residents in Stillwater report poor mental health at 13.5% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stillwater at 23.3% compared to 19.2% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stillwater at 13.0% compared to 9.8% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stillwater at 21.5% compared to 18.9% in Parker.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stillwater at 31.5% compared to 23.7% in Parker.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stillwater at 10.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stillwater | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (186) | 0.7% (432) |
| High School Diploma | 11.9% (2,297) | 6.8% (4,185) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (778) | 4.4% (2,679) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.4% (6,634) | 32.8% (20,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stillwater vs Parker
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.7% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater hold a high school diploma at 11.9% compared to 6.8% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parker at 4.4%, compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 32.8% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.