Demographics details for Stillwater, MN vs Franklin, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stillwater, MN vs Franklin, GA.
| Data | Stillwater | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,276 | 24,128 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 40.9 years |
| Median Income | $107,986 | $52,597 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Stillwater vs Franklin
- The population in Franklin is higher at 24,128, compared to 19,276 in Stillwater.
- Residents in Stillwater have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 40.9 years in Franklin.
- Stillwater has a higher median income of $107,986 compared to $52,597 in Franklin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Stillwater at 43.0% compared to 39.0% in Franklin.
- The poverty level is higher in Franklin at 13%, compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- Franklin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.5% in Stillwater.
Demographics
Demographics Stillwater vs Franklin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stillwater | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 9 |
| White | 83 | 81 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Stillwater vs Franklin
- In Franklin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 3% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 81% in Franklin.
- The Asian population is larger in Stillwater at 2% compared to 1% in Franklin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Stillwater at 7% compared to 5% in Franklin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Stillwater at 5% compared to 3% in Franklin.
- In Franklin, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Stillwater.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stillwater | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.5% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 37.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stillwater vs Franklin
- In Franklin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 13.5% in Stillwater.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Franklin at 23.4% versus 23.3% in Stillwater.
- Franklin has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 13.0% in Stillwater.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stillwater at 21.5% compared to 16.2% in Franklin.
- Franklin has higher obesity rates at 37.7% compared to 31.5% in Stillwater.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Franklin at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Stillwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stillwater | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (186) | 1.6% (394) |
| High School Diploma | 11.9% (2,297) | 16.4% (3,969) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (778) | 23.7% (5,721) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.4% (6,634) | 11.1% (2,688) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stillwater vs Franklin
- In Franklin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.0% in Stillwater.
- In Franklin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.4% compared to 11.9% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Franklin at 23.7%, compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 11.1% in Franklin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.