Demographics details for Stillwater, MN vs Fontana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stillwater, MN vs Fontana, CA.
| Data | Stillwater | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,276 | 212,475 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $107,986 | $93,230 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Stillwater vs Fontana
- The population in Fontana is higher at 212,475, compared to 19,276 in Stillwater.
- Residents in Stillwater have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Stillwater has a higher median income of $107,986 compared to $93,230 in Fontana.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Stillwater at 43.0% compared to 36.0% in Fontana.
- The poverty level is higher in Fontana at 13%, compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- Fontana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Stillwater.
Demographics
Demographics Stillwater vs Fontana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stillwater | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 8 |
| White | 83 | 2 |
| Asian | 2 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 68 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Stillwater vs Fontana
- In Fontana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 3% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- In Fontana, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Stillwater.
- Fontana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 7% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fontana at 14%, compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- In Fontana, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Stillwater.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stillwater | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.5% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stillwater vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 13.5% in Stillwater.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stillwater at 23.3% compared to 17.0% in Fontana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stillwater at 13.0% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stillwater at 21.5% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
- Fontana has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 31.5% in Stillwater.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stillwater at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stillwater | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (186) | 2.2% (4,748) |
| High School Diploma | 11.9% (2,297) | 16.3% (34,556) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (778) | 25.3% (53,655) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.4% (6,634) | 12.0% (25,587) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stillwater vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.0% in Stillwater.
- In Fontana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.3% compared to 11.9% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fontana at 25.3%, compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.