Demographics details for Stillwater, MN vs Enumclaw, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stillwater, MN vs Enumclaw, WA.
Data | Stillwater | Enumclaw |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,276 | 12,721 |
Median Age | 41.8 years | 40.7 years |
Median Income | $107,986 | $110,789 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Stillwater vs Enumclaw
- In Stillwater, the population is higher at 19,276, compared to 12,721 in Enumclaw.
- Residents in Stillwater have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 40.7 years in Enumclaw.
- Enumclaw has a higher median income of $110,789, compared to $107,986 in Stillwater.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Stillwater and Enumclaw at 43.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Enumclaw at 8%, compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- Enumclaw has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Stillwater.
Demographics
Demographics Stillwater vs Enumclaw provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Stillwater | Enumclaw |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 83 | 78 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 7 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stillwater vs Enumclaw
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stillwater at 3% compared to 1% in Enumclaw.
- Stillwater has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 78% in Enumclaw.
- Both Stillwater and Enumclaw have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Enumclaw has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 7% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Enumclaw at 9%, compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stillwater and Enumclaw at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Stillwater | Enumclaw |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 10.8% |
Depression | 23.3% | 28.2% |
Smoking | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Binge Drinking | 21.5% | 19.0% |
Obesity | 31.5% | 27.1% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stillwater vs Enumclaw
- In Enumclaw, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 13.5% in Stillwater.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Enumclaw at 28.2% versus 23.3% in Stillwater.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Stillwater and Enumclaw at 13.0%.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stillwater at 21.5% compared to 19.0% in Enumclaw.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stillwater at 31.5% compared to 27.1% in Enumclaw.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Enumclaw at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Stillwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Stillwater | Enumclaw |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (186) | 0.8% (103) |
High School Diploma | 11.9% (2,297) | 18.3% (2,334) |
Less than High School | 4.0% (778) | 5.6% (708) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.4% (6,634) | 22.0% (2,803) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stillwater vs Enumclaw
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Enumclaw.
- In Enumclaw, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 11.9% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Enumclaw at 5.6%, compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 22.0% in Enumclaw.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.