Demographics details for Stillwater, MN vs Cudahy, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stillwater, MN vs Cudahy, WI.
| Data | Stillwater | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,276 | 17,796 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $107,986 | $66,592 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Stillwater vs Cudahy
- In Stillwater, the population is higher at 19,276, compared to 17,796 in Cudahy.
- The median age in Cudahy is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 41.8 years in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has a higher median income of $107,986 compared to $66,592 in Cudahy.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Stillwater at 43.0% compared to 39.0% in Cudahy.
- The poverty level is higher in Cudahy at 11%, compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Stillwater and Cudahy at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Stillwater vs Cudahy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stillwater | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 3 |
| White | 83 | 77 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stillwater vs Cudahy
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Stillwater and Cudahy at 3%.
- Stillwater has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 77% in Cudahy.
- Both Stillwater and Cudahy have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Cudahy has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 7% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cudahy at 9%, compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stillwater and Cudahy at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stillwater | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.5% | 26.4% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stillwater vs Cudahy
- In Cudahy, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 13.5% in Stillwater.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cudahy at 24.3% versus 23.3% in Stillwater.
- Cudahy has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 13.0% in Stillwater.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cudahy at 26.4% compared to 21.5% in Stillwater.
- Cudahy has higher obesity rates at 34.2% compared to 31.5% in Stillwater.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cudahy at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Stillwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stillwater | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (186) | 0.9% (166) |
| High School Diploma | 11.9% (2,297) | 25.1% (4,460) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (778) | 9.9% (1,768) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.4% (6,634) | 21.0% (3,730) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stillwater vs Cudahy
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Cudahy.
- In Cudahy, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 11.9% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cudahy at 9.9%, compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 21.0% in Cudahy.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.