Demographics details for Stillwater, MN vs Clemmons, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stillwater, MN vs Clemmons, NC.
Data | Stillwater | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,276 | 21,823 |
Median Age | 41.8 years | 42.4 years |
Median Income | $107,986 | $75,667 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Stillwater vs Clemmons
- The population in Clemmons is higher at 21,823, compared to 19,276 in Stillwater.
- The median age in Clemmons is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 41.8 years in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has a higher median income of $107,986 compared to $75,667 in Clemmons.
- In Clemmons, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 43.0% in Stillwater.
- The poverty level is identical in both Stillwater and Clemmons at 5%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Stillwater and Clemmons at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Stillwater vs Clemmons provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Stillwater | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 6 |
White | 83 | 76 |
Asian | 2 | 5 |
Hispanic | 7 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Stillwater vs Clemmons
- In Clemmons, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 76% in Clemmons.
- In Clemmons, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Stillwater.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Stillwater at 7% compared to 6% in Clemmons.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clemmons at 6%, compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- In Clemmons, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Stillwater.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Stillwater | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 13.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 8.8% |
Depression | 23.3% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 13.0% | 12.5% |
Binge Drinking | 21.5% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 31.5% | 29.7% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stillwater vs Clemmons
- In Clemmons, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.9% compared to 13.5% in Stillwater.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clemmons at 23.7% versus 23.3% in Stillwater.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stillwater at 13.0% compared to 12.5% in Clemmons.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stillwater at 21.5% compared to 17.8% in Clemmons.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stillwater at 31.5% compared to 29.7% in Clemmons.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Stillwater and Clemmons at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Stillwater | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (186) | 0.6% (140) |
High School Diploma | 11.9% (2,297) | 9.3% (2,040) |
Less than High School | 4.0% (778) | 6.5% (1,429) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.4% (6,634) | 34.0% (7,418) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stillwater vs Clemmons
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Clemmons.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater hold a high school diploma at 11.9% compared to 9.3% in Clemmons.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clemmons at 6.5%, compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 34.0% in Clemmons.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.