Demographics details for Stillwater, MN vs Arrington, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stillwater, MN vs Arrington, VA.
Data | Stillwater | Arrington |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,276 | 1,226 |
Median Age | 41.8 years | 31.3 years |
Median Income | $107,986 | $58,144 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Stillwater vs Arrington
- In Stillwater, the population is higher at 19,276, compared to 1,226 in Arrington.
- Residents in Stillwater have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 31.3 years in Arrington.
- Stillwater has a higher median income of $107,986 compared to $58,144 in Arrington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Stillwater at 43.0% compared to 40.0% in Arrington.
- The poverty level is higher in Arrington at 8%, compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Stillwater and Arrington at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Stillwater vs Arrington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Stillwater | Arrington |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 41 |
White | 83 | 59 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stillwater vs Arrington
- In Arrington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 3% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 59% in Arrington.
- The Asian population is larger in Stillwater at 2% compared to 0% in Arrington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Stillwater at 7% compared to 0% in Arrington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Stillwater at 5% compared to 0% in Arrington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stillwater and Arrington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Stillwater | Arrington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 19.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 14.0% |
Depression | 23.3% | 25.2% |
Smoking | 13.0% | 23.1% |
Binge Drinking | 21.5% | 15.3% |
Obesity | 31.5% | 42.4% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stillwater vs Arrington
- In Arrington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 13.5% in Stillwater.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Arrington at 25.2% versus 23.3% in Stillwater.
- Arrington has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 13.0% in Stillwater.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stillwater at 21.5% compared to 15.3% in Arrington.
- Arrington has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 31.5% in Stillwater.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stillwater at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Arrington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Stillwater | Arrington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (186) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 11.9% (2,297) | 17.0% (208) |
Less than High School | 4.0% (778) | 21.2% (260) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.4% (6,634) | 20.1% (247) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stillwater vs Arrington
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Arrington.
- In Arrington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 11.9% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Arrington at 21.2%, compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 20.1% in Arrington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.