Demographics details for Stewart, MN vs Baldwin park, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Stewart, MN vs Baldwin park, CA.

Data Stewart Baldwin park
Population 474 69,455
Median Age 36.9 years 37.1 years
Median Income $52,813 $76,002
Married Families 43.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 6.3

Population Comparison: Stewart vs Baldwin park

  • The population in Baldwin park is higher at 69,455, compared to 474 in Stewart.
  • The median age in Baldwin park is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 36.9 years in Stewart.
  • Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002, compared to $52,813 in Stewart.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Stewart at 43.0% compared to 37.0% in Baldwin park.
  • The poverty level is higher in Baldwin park at 12%, compared to 0% in Stewart.
  • Baldwin park has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 3.5% in Stewart.

Demographics

Demographics Stewart vs Baldwin park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Stewart Baldwin park
Black Data is updating 1
White 70 -25
Asian Data is updating 23
Hispanic 24 75
Two or More Races 6 23
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Stewart vs Baldwin park

  • In Baldwin park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Stewart.
  • Stewart has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
  • In Baldwin park, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 0% in Stewart.
  • Baldwin park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 24% in Stewart.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Baldwin park at 23%, compared to 6% in Stewart.
  • In Baldwin park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Stewart.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Stewart Baldwin park
Mental Health Not Good 15.1% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 12.7%
Depression 23.1% 14.7%
Smoking 19.3% 11.4%
Binge Drinking 20.3% 14.2%
Obesity 38.6% 29.9%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Stewart vs Baldwin park

  • In Baldwin park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 15.1% in Stewart.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Stewart at 23.1% compared to 14.7% in Baldwin park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Stewart at 19.3% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Stewart at 20.3% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Stewart at 38.6% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Stewart at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Stewart Baldwin park
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 5.5% (3,853)
High School Diploma 30.8% (146) 18.1% (12,587)
Less than High School 13.1% (62) 41.7% (28,939)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 2.5% (12) 9.8% (6,787)

Education Levels Comparison: Stewart vs Baldwin park

  • In Baldwin park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.0% in Stewart.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Stewart hold a high school diploma at 30.8% compared to 18.1% in Baldwin park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Baldwin park at 41.7%, compared to 13.1% in Stewart.
  • In Baldwin park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 2.5% in Stewart.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.