Demographics details for Steubenville, OH vs Moscow, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Steubenville, OH vs Moscow, ID.
| Data | Steubenville | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,030 | 26,249 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 24.8 years |
| Median Income | $42,725 | $53,679 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Steubenville vs Moscow
- The population in Moscow is higher at 26,249, compared to 18,030 in Steubenville.
- Residents in Steubenville have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 24.8 years in Moscow.
- Moscow has a higher median income of $53,679, compared to $42,725 in Steubenville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Steubenville at 29.0% compared to 28.0% in Moscow.
- Steubenville has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 15% in Moscow.
- The unemployment rate in Steubenville is higher at 6.2%, compared to 4.2% in Moscow.
Demographics
Demographics Steubenville vs Moscow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Steubenville | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | 2 |
| White | 74 | 83 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Steubenville vs Moscow
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Steubenville at 14% compared to 2% in Moscow.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Moscow at 83% compared to 74% in Steubenville.
- In Moscow, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Steubenville.
- Moscow has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Steubenville.
- Both Steubenville and Moscow have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- In Moscow, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Steubenville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Steubenville | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 27.4% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 45.0% | 31.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Steubenville vs Moscow
- More residents in Steubenville report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 15.4% in Moscow.
- Depression is more prevalent in Steubenville at 25.5% compared to 24.5% in Moscow.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Steubenville at 27.4% compared to 13.6% in Moscow.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Moscow at 17.1% compared to 16.3% in Steubenville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Steubenville at 45.0% compared to 31.2% in Moscow.
- Disability percentages are higher in Steubenville at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Moscow.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Steubenville | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (93) | 0.3% (80) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (4,083) | 5.7% (1,492) |
| Less than High School | 9.9% (1,788) | 2.0% (515) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (3,403) | 25.8% (6,776) |
Education Levels Comparison: Steubenville vs Moscow
- A higher percentage of residents in Steubenville have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Moscow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Steubenville hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 5.7% in Moscow.
- More residents in Steubenville have less than a high school education at 9.9% compared to 2.0% in Moscow.
- In Moscow, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.8% compared to 18.9% in Steubenville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.