Demographics details for Sterling, OK vs Vancouver, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sterling, OK vs Vancouver, WA.
| Data | Sterling | Vancouver |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 678 | 194,512 |
| Median Age | 39.7 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $64,464 | $73,626 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Sterling vs Vancouver
- The population in Vancouver is higher at 194,512, compared to 678 in Sterling.
- Residents in Sterling have a higher median age of 39.7 years compared to 37.4 years in Vancouver.
- Vancouver has a higher median income of $73,626, compared to $64,464 in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling at 47.0% compared to 36.0% in Vancouver.
- Sterling has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Vancouver.
- Vancouver has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.5% in Sterling.
Demographics
Demographics Sterling vs Vancouver provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sterling | Vancouver |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 82 | 65 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sterling vs Vancouver
- In Vancouver, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Sterling.
- Sterling has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 65% in Vancouver.
- In Vancouver, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Sterling.
- Vancouver has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 6% in Sterling.
- Both Sterling and Vancouver have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- In Vancouver, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sterling.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sterling | Vancouver |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 28.2% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 14.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 42.3% | 33.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 40.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling vs Vancouver
- More residents in Sterling report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.5% in Vancouver.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sterling at 28.2% compared to 25.7% in Vancouver.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sterling at 20.1% compared to 14.5% in Vancouver.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Vancouver at 17.7% compared to 16.4% in Sterling.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sterling at 42.3% compared to 33.1% in Vancouver.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sterling at 40.0% compared to 14.0% in Vancouver.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sterling | Vancouver |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (1,478) |
| High School Diploma | 45.0% (305) | 13.9% (26,995) |
| Less than High School | 11.2% (76) | 10.7% (20,890) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.5% (44) | 21.2% (41,308) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sterling vs Vancouver
- In Vancouver, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling hold a high school diploma at 45.0% compared to 13.9% in Vancouver.
- More residents in Sterling have less than a high school education at 11.2% compared to 10.7% in Vancouver.
- In Vancouver, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 6.5% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.