Demographics details for Sterling, IL vs Sulphur, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sterling, IL vs Sulphur, OK.
| Data | Sterling | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,566 | 4,951 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $49,007 | $55,951 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sterling vs Sulphur
- In Sterling, the population is higher at 14,566, compared to 4,951 in Sulphur.
- Residents in Sterling have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 38.8 years in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher median income of $55,951, compared to $49,007 in Sterling.
- In Sulphur, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 32.0% in Sterling.
- The poverty level is higher in Sulphur at 14%, compared to 12% in Sterling.
- The unemployment rate in Sterling is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Sulphur.
Demographics
Demographics Sterling vs Sulphur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sterling | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 56 | 60 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 27 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 16 |
| American Indian | 1 | 10 |
Demographics Comparison: Sterling vs Sulphur
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Sterling and Sulphur at 2%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sulphur at 60% compared to 56% in Sterling.
- The Asian population is larger in Sterling at 2% compared to 0% in Sulphur.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sterling at 27% compared to 12% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sulphur at 16%, compared to 12% in Sterling.
- In Sulphur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 10%, compared to 1% in Sterling.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sterling | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.7% in Sterling.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sulphur at 25.3% versus 22.2% in Sterling.
- Sulphur has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 18.6% in Sterling.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sterling at 17.4% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 39.5% in Sterling.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sulphur at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Sterling.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sterling | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (164) | 1.8% (88) |
| High School Diploma | 24.1% (3,511) | 18.2% (899) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (2,012) | 18.1% (898) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (1,713) | 10.9% (542) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sterling vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.1% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 18.2% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur at 18.1%, compared to 13.8% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 10.9% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.