Demographics details for Sterling, IL vs Pleasant hill, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sterling, IL vs Pleasant hill, CA.
Data | Sterling | Pleasant hill |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,566 | 33,913 |
Median Age | 43.0 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $49,007 | $137,685 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Sterling vs Pleasant hill
- The population in Pleasant hill is higher at 33,913, compared to 14,566 in Sterling.
- Residents in Sterling have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 42.0 years in Pleasant hill.
- Pleasant hill has a higher median income of $137,685, compared to $49,007 in Sterling.
- In Pleasant hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 32.0% in Sterling.
- Sterling has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 4% in Pleasant hill.
- Pleasant hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.2% in Sterling.
Demographics
Demographics Sterling vs Pleasant hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sterling | Pleasant hill |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 4 |
White | 56 | 54 |
Asian | 2 | 17 |
Hispanic | 27 | 14 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sterling vs Pleasant hill
- In Pleasant hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Sterling.
- Sterling has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 54% in Pleasant hill.
- In Pleasant hill, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 2% in Sterling.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sterling at 27% compared to 14% in Pleasant hill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sterling at 12% compared to 11% in Pleasant hill.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sterling at 1% compared to 0% in Pleasant hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sterling | Pleasant hill |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 13.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 8.1% |
Depression | 22.2% | 17.4% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 8.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 22.6% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling vs Pleasant hill
- More residents in Sterling report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 13.4% in Pleasant hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sterling at 22.2% compared to 17.4% in Pleasant hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sterling at 18.6% compared to 8.3% in Pleasant hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pleasant hill at 17.7% compared to 17.4% in Sterling.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sterling at 39.5% compared to 22.6% in Pleasant hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sterling at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Pleasant hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sterling | Pleasant hill |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (164) | 1.4% (469) |
High School Diploma | 24.1% (3,511) | 7.5% (2,527) |
Less than High School | 13.8% (2,012) | 5.8% (1,962) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (1,713) | 40.9% (13,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sterling vs Pleasant hill
- In Pleasant hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.1% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 7.5% in Pleasant hill.
- More residents in Sterling have less than a high school education at 13.8% compared to 5.8% in Pleasant hill.
- In Pleasant hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.9% compared to 11.8% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.