Demographics details for Sterling, IL vs Huntington park, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling, IL vs Huntington park, CA.

Data Sterling Huntington park
Population 14,566 52,633
Median Age 43.0 years 33.5 years
Median Income $49,007 $54,073
Married Families 32.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 12% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 5.7

Population Comparison: Sterling vs Huntington park

  • The population in Huntington park is higher at 52,633, compared to 14,566 in Sterling.
  • Residents in Sterling have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 33.5 years in Huntington park.
  • Huntington park has a higher median income of $54,073, compared to $49,007 in Sterling.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling at 32.0% compared to 30.0% in Huntington park.
  • The poverty level is higher in Huntington park at 15%, compared to 12% in Sterling.
  • Huntington park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.2% in Sterling.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling vs Huntington park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling Huntington park
Black 2 1
White 56 22
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 27 101
Two or More Races 12 20
American Indian 1 2

Demographics Comparison: Sterling vs Huntington park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sterling at 2% compared to 1% in Huntington park.
  • Sterling has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 22% in Huntington park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sterling at 2% compared to 1% in Huntington park.
  • Huntington park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 101%, compared to 27% in Sterling.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Huntington park at 20%, compared to 12% in Sterling.
  • In Huntington park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Sterling.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling Huntington park
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 18.2%
Physical Health Not Good 12.2% 17.1%
Depression 22.2% 17.1%
Smoking 18.6% 15.0%
Binge Drinking 17.4% 13.7%
Obesity 39.5% 36.2%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling vs Huntington park

  • In Huntington park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.7% in Sterling.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sterling at 22.2% compared to 17.1% in Huntington park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sterling at 18.6% compared to 15.0% in Huntington park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sterling at 17.4% compared to 13.7% in Huntington park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sterling at 39.5% compared to 36.2% in Huntington park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sterling at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Huntington park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling Huntington park
No Schooling 1.1% (164) 5.9% (3,103)
High School Diploma 24.1% (3,511) 15.7% (8,283)
Less than High School 13.8% (2,012) 60.1% (31,608)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.8% (1,713) 5.0% (2,648)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling vs Huntington park

  • In Huntington park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.9% compared to 1.1% in Sterling.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 15.7% in Huntington park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Huntington park at 60.1%, compared to 13.8% in Sterling.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 5.0% in Huntington park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.