Demographics details for Sterling, IL vs Hopkins, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sterling, IL vs Hopkins, SC.
Data | Sterling | Hopkins |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,566 | 1,738 |
Median Age | 43.0 years | 53.9 years |
Median Income | $49,007 | $57,262 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sterling vs Hopkins
- In Sterling, the population is higher at 14,566, compared to 1,738 in Hopkins.
- The median age in Hopkins is higher at 53.9 years, compared to 43.0 years in Sterling.
- Hopkins has a higher median income of $57,262, compared to $49,007 in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling at 32.0% compared to 25.0% in Hopkins.
- Sterling has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The unemployment rate in Sterling is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Hopkins.
Demographics
Demographics Sterling vs Hopkins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sterling | Hopkins |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 83 |
White | 56 | 16 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 27 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 12 | 1 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sterling vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 83% compared to 2% in Sterling.
- Sterling has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 16% in Hopkins.
- The Asian population is larger in Sterling at 2% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sterling at 27% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sterling at 12% compared to 1% in Hopkins.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sterling at 1% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sterling | Hopkins |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 19.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 13.9% |
Depression | 22.2% | 18.8% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 21.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 16.0% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 44.2% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 34.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 16.7% in Sterling.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sterling at 22.2% compared to 18.8% in Hopkins.
- Hopkins has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 18.6% in Sterling.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sterling at 17.4% compared to 16.0% in Hopkins.
- Hopkins has higher obesity rates at 44.2% compared to 39.5% in Sterling.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hopkins at 34.0% compared to 17.0% in Sterling.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sterling | Hopkins |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (164) | 0.1% (2) |
High School Diploma | 24.1% (3,511) | 20.8% (362) |
Less than High School | 13.8% (2,012) | 11.3% (197) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (1,713) | 16.2% (281) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sterling vs Hopkins
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.1% in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 20.8% in Hopkins.
- More residents in Sterling have less than a high school education at 13.8% compared to 11.3% in Hopkins.
- In Hopkins, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 11.8% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.