Demographics details for Sterling, IL vs Douglas, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sterling, IL vs Douglas, NE.
| Data | Sterling | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,566 | 171 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $49,007 | $65,000 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Sterling vs Douglas
- In Sterling, the population is higher at 14,566, compared to 171 in Douglas.
- Residents in Sterling have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 33.4 years in Douglas.
- Douglas has a higher median income of $65,000, compared to $49,007 in Sterling.
- In Douglas, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 32.0% in Sterling.
- Sterling has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Douglas.
- The unemployment rate in Sterling is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.5% in Douglas.
Demographics
Demographics Sterling vs Douglas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sterling | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 56 | 97 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 27 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sterling vs Douglas
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sterling at 2% compared to 0% in Douglas.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Douglas at 97% compared to 56% in Sterling.
- The Asian population is larger in Sterling at 2% compared to 1% in Douglas.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sterling at 27% compared to 0% in Douglas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sterling at 12% compared to 2% in Douglas.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sterling at 1% compared to 0% in Douglas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sterling | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 8.3% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 23.1% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling vs Douglas
- More residents in Sterling report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 12.7% in Douglas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sterling at 22.2% compared to 18.5% in Douglas.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sterling at 18.6% compared to 13.6% in Douglas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Douglas at 23.1% compared to 17.4% in Sterling.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sterling at 39.5% compared to 36.8% in Douglas.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Douglas at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Sterling.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sterling | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (164) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 24.1% (3,511) | 10.5% (18) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (2,012) | 38.6% (66) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (1,713) | 11.1% (19) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sterling vs Douglas
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Douglas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 10.5% in Douglas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Douglas at 38.6%, compared to 13.8% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 11.1% in Douglas.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.