Demographics details for Sterling, CT vs Richmond hill, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sterling, CT vs Richmond hill, GA.
Data | Sterling | Richmond hill |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,830 | 18,091 |
Median Age | 42.0 years | 31.0 years |
Median Income | $85,000 | $83,519 |
Married Families | 80.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sterling vs Richmond hill
- The population in Richmond hill is higher at 18,091, compared to 3,830 in Sterling.
- Residents in Sterling have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 31.0 years in Richmond hill.
- Sterling has a higher median income of $85,000 compared to $83,519 in Richmond hill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling at 80.0% compared to 35.0% in Richmond hill.
- The poverty level is higher in Richmond hill at 10%, compared to 5% in Sterling.
- Richmond hill has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.9% in Sterling.
Demographics
Demographics Sterling vs Richmond hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sterling | Richmond hill |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 13 |
White | 95 | 66 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 2 | 11 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sterling vs Richmond hill
- In Richmond hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 2% in Sterling.
- Sterling has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 66% in Richmond hill.
- In Richmond hill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Sterling.
- Richmond hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 2% in Sterling.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richmond hill at 8%, compared to 0% in Sterling.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sterling and Richmond hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sterling | Richmond hill |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 10.6% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 21.8% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 14.2% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.2% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 34.4% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling vs Richmond hill
- In Richmond hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richmond hill at 21.8% versus 0.0% in Sterling.
- Richmond hill has a higher smoking rate at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Richmond hill at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Richmond hill has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Richmond hill at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sterling | Richmond hill |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (9) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 7.7% (1,395) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 5.7% (1,037) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 19.5% (3,532) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sterling vs Richmond hill
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sterling and Richmond hill at 0.0%.
- In Richmond hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.7% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Richmond hill at 5.7%, compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- In Richmond hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.