Demographics details for Sterling, CT vs Middle river, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling, CT vs Middle river, MD.

Data Sterling Middle river
Population 3,830 31,155
Median Age 42.0 years 36.7 years
Median Income $85,000 $72,970
Married Families 80.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 5% 8%
Unemployment Rate 2.9 4.0

Population Comparison: Sterling vs Middle river

  • The population in Middle river is higher at 31,155, compared to 3,830 in Sterling.
  • Residents in Sterling have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 36.7 years in Middle river.
  • Sterling has a higher median income of $85,000 compared to $72,970 in Middle river.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling at 80.0% compared to 33.0% in Middle river.
  • The poverty level is higher in Middle river at 8%, compared to 5% in Sterling.
  • Middle river has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.9% in Sterling.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling vs Middle river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling Middle river
Black 2 29
White 95 51
Asian 1 7
Hispanic 2 8
Two or More Races Data is updating 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sterling vs Middle river

  • In Middle river, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 2% in Sterling.
  • Sterling has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 51% in Middle river.
  • In Middle river, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Sterling.
  • Middle river has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 2% in Sterling.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Middle river at 5%, compared to 0% in Sterling.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sterling and Middle river at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling Middle river
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 11.1%
Depression Data is updating% 24.1%
Smoking Data is updating% 17.2%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 15.0%
Obesity Data is updating% 38.7%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling vs Middle river

  • In Middle river, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Middle river at 24.1% versus 0.0% in Sterling.
  • Middle river has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Middle river at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
  • Middle river has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Middle river at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling Middle river
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.6% (818)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 20.1% (6,254)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 14.8% (4,616)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 19.4% (6,048)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling vs Middle river

  • In Middle river, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
  • In Middle river, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Middle river at 14.8%, compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
  • In Middle river, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.