Demographics details for Sterling, CT vs Greenwood, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sterling, CT vs Greenwood, IN.
Data | Sterling | Greenwood |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,830 | 65,406 |
Median Age | 42.0 years | 36.2 years |
Median Income | $85,000 | $75,398 |
Married Families | 80.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Sterling vs Greenwood
- The population in Greenwood is higher at 65,406, compared to 3,830 in Sterling.
- Residents in Sterling have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 36.2 years in Greenwood.
- Sterling has a higher median income of $85,000 compared to $75,398 in Greenwood.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling at 80.0% compared to 40.0% in Greenwood.
- The poverty level is higher in Greenwood at 7%, compared to 5% in Sterling.
- Greenwood has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 2.9% in Sterling.
Demographics
Demographics Sterling vs Greenwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sterling | Greenwood |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 4 |
White | 95 | 76 |
Asian | 1 | 7 |
Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sterling vs Greenwood
- In Greenwood, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Sterling.
- Sterling has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 76% in Greenwood.
- In Greenwood, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Sterling.
- Greenwood has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Sterling.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Greenwood at 6%, compared to 0% in Sterling.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sterling and Greenwood at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sterling | Greenwood |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 16.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 10.4% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 27.4% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 17.2% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.9% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 40.0% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling vs Greenwood
- In Greenwood, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Greenwood at 27.4% versus 0.0% in Sterling.
- Greenwood has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Greenwood at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Greenwood has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Greenwood at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sterling | Greenwood |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.5% (1,000) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 17.0% (11,136) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 10.7% (6,995) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 20.0% (13,060) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sterling vs Greenwood
- In Greenwood, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- In Greenwood, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Greenwood at 10.7%, compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- In Greenwood, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.