Demographics details for Sterling, CT vs Brundidge, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling, CT vs Brundidge, AL.

Data Sterling Brundidge
Population 3,830 2,034
Median Age 42.0 years 49.9 years
Median Income $85,000 $37,627
Married Families 80.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 5% 20%
Unemployment Rate 2.9 4.0

Population Comparison: Sterling vs Brundidge

  • In Sterling, the population is higher at 3,830, compared to 2,034 in Brundidge.
  • The median age in Brundidge is higher at 49.9 years, compared to 42.0 years in Sterling.
  • Sterling has a higher median income of $85,000 compared to $37,627 in Brundidge.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling at 80.0% compared to 39.0% in Brundidge.
  • The poverty level is higher in Brundidge at 20%, compared to 5% in Sterling.
  • Brundidge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.9% in Sterling.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling vs Brundidge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling Brundidge
Black 2 67
White 95 12
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 16
Two or More Races Data is updating 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sterling vs Brundidge

  • In Brundidge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 67% compared to 2% in Sterling.
  • Sterling has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 12% in Brundidge.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sterling at 1% compared to 0% in Brundidge.
  • Brundidge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 2% in Sterling.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Brundidge at 5%, compared to 0% in Sterling.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sterling and Brundidge at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling Brundidge
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 20.5%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.2%
Depression Data is updating% 20.7%
Smoking Data is updating% 23.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 12.2%
Obesity Data is updating% 45.7%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 25.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling vs Brundidge

  • In Brundidge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Brundidge at 20.7% versus 0.0% in Sterling.
  • Brundidge has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Brundidge at 12.2% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
  • Brundidge has higher obesity rates at 45.7% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Brundidge at 25.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling Brundidge
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.5% (11)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 35.9% (731)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 22.7% (461)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.8% (240)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling vs Brundidge

  • In Brundidge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
  • In Brundidge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.9% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Brundidge at 22.7%, compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
  • In Brundidge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.