Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Yakima, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Yakima, WA.

Data Sterling heights Yakima
Population 132,567 97,012
Median Age 41.2 years 33.9 years
Median Income $75,381 $55,734
Married Families 45.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 8% 16%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 5.4

Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Yakima

  • In Sterling heights, the population is higher at 132,567, compared to 97,012 in Yakima.
  • Residents in Sterling heights have a higher median age of 41.2 years compared to 33.9 years in Yakima.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381 compared to $55,734 in Yakima.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling heights at 45.0% compared to 33.0% in Yakima.
  • The poverty level is higher in Yakima at 16%, compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • Yakima has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 4.7% in Sterling heights.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling heights vs Yakima provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling heights Yakima
Black 6 1
White 79 34
Asian 9 1
Hispanic 2 47
Two or More Races 4 16
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Yakima

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sterling heights at 6% compared to 1% in Yakima.
  • Sterling heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 34% in Yakima.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sterling heights at 9% compared to 1% in Yakima.
  • Yakima has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 47%, compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yakima at 16%, compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • In Yakima, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sterling heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling heights Yakima
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 14.7%
Depression 25.5% 23.6%
Smoking 19.8% 17.4%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 15.4%
Obesity 36.6% 39.7%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Yakima

  • In Yakima, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 25.5% compared to 23.6% in Yakima.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 19.8% compared to 17.4% in Yakima.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 15.4% in Yakima.
  • Yakima has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Yakima at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling heights Yakima
No Schooling 2.4% (3,134) 1.8% (1,748)
High School Diploma 18.8% (24,937) 13.4% (12,983)
Less than High School 16.6% (22,008) 27.9% (27,106)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (29,518) 12.1% (11,743)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Yakima

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.8% in Yakima.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 13.4% in Yakima.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yakima at 27.9%, compared to 16.6% in Sterling heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 12.1% in Yakima.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.