Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Thomaston, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Thomaston, GA.

Data Sterling heights Thomaston
Population 132,567 9,858
Median Age 41.2 years 36.7 years
Median Income $75,381 $30,298
Married Families 45.0% 23.0%
Poverty Level 8% 28%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 4.2

Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Thomaston

  • In Sterling heights, the population is higher at 132,567, compared to 9,858 in Thomaston.
  • Residents in Sterling heights have a higher median age of 41.2 years compared to 36.7 years in Thomaston.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381 compared to $30,298 in Thomaston.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling heights at 45.0% compared to 23.0% in Thomaston.
  • The poverty level is higher in Thomaston at 28%, compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Sterling heights is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.2% in Thomaston.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling heights vs Thomaston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling heights Thomaston
Black 6 38
White 79 56
Asian 9 1
Hispanic 2 3
Two or More Races 4 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Thomaston

  • In Thomaston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 6% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 56% in Thomaston.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sterling heights at 9% compared to 1% in Thomaston.
  • Thomaston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sterling heights at 4% compared to 2% in Thomaston.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sterling heights and Thomaston at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling heights Thomaston
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 14.6%
Depression 25.5% 22.4%
Smoking 19.8% 22.2%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 13.9%
Obesity 36.6% 39.8%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Thomaston

  • In Thomaston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 25.5% compared to 22.4% in Thomaston.
  • Thomaston has a higher smoking rate at 22.2% compared to 19.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 13.9% in Thomaston.
  • Thomaston has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Thomaston at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling heights Thomaston
No Schooling 2.4% (3,134) 2.7% (264)
High School Diploma 18.8% (24,937) 14.9% (1,473)
Less than High School 16.6% (22,008) 13.3% (1,308)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (29,518) 11.7% (1,153)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Thomaston

  • In Thomaston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 2.4% in Sterling heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 14.9% in Thomaston.
  • More residents in Sterling heights have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 13.3% in Thomaston.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 11.7% in Thomaston.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.