Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Sacramento, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Sacramento, CA.

Data Sterling heights Sacramento
Population 132,567 528,001
Median Age 41.2 years 35.2 years
Median Income $75,381 $78,954
Married Families 45.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 8% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 5.0

Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Sacramento

  • The population in Sacramento is higher at 528,001, compared to 132,567 in Sterling heights.
  • Residents in Sterling heights have a higher median age of 41.2 years compared to 35.2 years in Sacramento.
  • Sacramento has a higher median income of $78,954, compared to $75,381 in Sterling heights.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling heights at 45.0% compared to 33.0% in Sacramento.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sacramento at 12%, compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • Sacramento has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.7% in Sterling heights.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling heights vs Sacramento provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling heights Sacramento
Black 6 12
White 79 26
Asian 9 19
Hispanic 2 29
Two or More Races 4 13
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Sacramento

  • In Sacramento, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 6% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 26% in Sacramento.
  • In Sacramento, the Asian population stands at 19%, greater than 9% in Sterling heights.
  • Sacramento has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sacramento at 13%, compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • In Sacramento, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sterling heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling heights Sacramento
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 11.5%
Depression 25.5% 18.3%
Smoking 19.8% 13.7%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 14.5%
Obesity 36.6% 32.7%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Sacramento

  • More residents in Sterling heights report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.6% in Sacramento.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 25.5% compared to 18.3% in Sacramento.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 19.8% compared to 13.7% in Sacramento.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 14.5% in Sacramento.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sterling heights at 36.6% compared to 32.7% in Sacramento.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Sacramento.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling heights Sacramento
No Schooling 2.4% (3,134) 2.7% (14,512)
High School Diploma 18.8% (24,937) 11.7% (62,039)
Less than High School 16.6% (22,008) 14.7% (77,760)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (29,518) 24.4% (128,743)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Sacramento

  • In Sacramento, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 2.4% in Sterling heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 11.7% in Sacramento.
  • More residents in Sterling heights have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 14.7% in Sacramento.
  • In Sacramento, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 22.3% in Sterling heights.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.