Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Parksley, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Parksley, VA.

Data Sterling heights Parksley
Population 132,567 808
Median Age 41.2 years 43.6 years
Median Income $75,381 $74,844
Married Families 45.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 8% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 4.5

Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Parksley

  • In Sterling heights, the population is higher at 132,567, compared to 808 in Parksley.
  • The median age in Parksley is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 41.2 years in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381 compared to $74,844 in Parksley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling heights at 45.0% compared to 31.0% in Parksley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Parksley at 9%, compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Sterling heights is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.5% in Parksley.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling heights vs Parksley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling heights Parksley
Black 6 35
White 79 46
Asian 9 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 13
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Parksley

  • In Parksley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 6% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 46% in Parksley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sterling heights at 9% compared to 0% in Parksley.
  • Parksley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Parksley at 6%, compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sterling heights and Parksley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling heights Parksley
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 14.4%
Depression 25.5% 23.3%
Smoking 19.8% 22.6%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 15.6%
Obesity 36.6% 40.0%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Parksley

  • In Parksley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 25.5% compared to 23.3% in Parksley.
  • Parksley has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 19.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 15.6% in Parksley.
  • Parksley has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Parksley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling heights Parksley
No Schooling 2.4% (3,134) 2.0% (16)
High School Diploma 18.8% (24,937) 19.1% (154)
Less than High School 16.6% (22,008) 22.3% (180)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (29,518) 17.9% (145)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Parksley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 2.0% in Parksley.
  • In Parksley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.1% compared to 18.8% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parksley at 22.3%, compared to 16.6% in Sterling heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 17.9% in Parksley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.