Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Oakesdale, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Oakesdale, WA.
Data | Sterling heights | Oakesdale |
---|---|---|
Population | 132,567 | 393 |
Median Age | 41.2 years | 45.8 years |
Median Income | $75,381 | $70,333 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 52.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Oakesdale
- In Sterling heights, the population is higher at 132,567, compared to 393 in Oakesdale.
- The median age in Oakesdale is higher at 45.8 years, compared to 41.2 years in Sterling heights.
- Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381 compared to $70,333 in Oakesdale.
- In Oakesdale, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 45.0% in Sterling heights.
- Sterling heights has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 7% in Oakesdale.
- The unemployment rate in Sterling heights is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.2% in Oakesdale.
Demographics
Demographics Sterling heights vs Oakesdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sterling heights | Oakesdale |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 4 |
White | 79 | 74 |
Asian | 9 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 17 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Oakesdale
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sterling heights at 6% compared to 4% in Oakesdale.
- Sterling heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 74% in Oakesdale.
- The Asian population is larger in Sterling heights at 9% compared to 0% in Oakesdale.
- Oakesdale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oakesdale at 17%, compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sterling heights and Oakesdale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sterling heights | Oakesdale |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 9.7% |
Depression | 25.5% | 28.0% |
Smoking | 19.8% | 11.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 18.6% |
Obesity | 36.6% | 31.9% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Oakesdale
- More residents in Sterling heights report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.1% in Oakesdale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Oakesdale at 28.0% versus 25.5% in Sterling heights.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 19.8% compared to 11.5% in Oakesdale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Oakesdale at 18.6% compared to 17.7% in Sterling heights.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sterling heights at 36.6% compared to 31.9% in Oakesdale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Oakesdale at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sterling heights | Oakesdale |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.4% (3,134) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 18.8% (24,937) | 8.4% (33) |
Less than High School | 16.6% (22,008) | 12.5% (49) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (29,518) | 18.8% (74) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Oakesdale
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Oakesdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 8.4% in Oakesdale.
- More residents in Sterling heights have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 12.5% in Oakesdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 18.8% in Oakesdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.