Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Ho ho kus, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Ho ho kus, NJ.

Data Sterling heights Ho ho kus
Population 132,567 4,216
Median Age 41.2 years 43.0 years
Median Income $75,381 $250,001
Married Families 45.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 8% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.7 2.5

Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Ho ho kus

  • In Sterling heights, the population is higher at 132,567, compared to 4,216 in Ho ho kus.
  • The median age in Ho ho kus is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 41.2 years in Sterling heights.
  • Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $75,381 in Sterling heights.
  • In Ho ho kus, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 45.0% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
  • The unemployment rate in Sterling heights is higher at 4.7%, compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling heights vs Ho ho kus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling heights Ho ho kus
Black 6 1
White 79 67
Asian 9 12
Hispanic 2 12
Two or More Races 4 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Ho ho kus

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sterling heights at 6% compared to 1% in Ho ho kus.
  • Sterling heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 67% in Ho ho kus.
  • In Ho ho kus, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 9% in Sterling heights.
  • Ho ho kus has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ho ho kus at 8%, compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sterling heights and Ho ho kus at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling heights Ho ho kus
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 11.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 5.8%
Depression 25.5% 16.6%
Smoking 19.8% 6.9%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 19.6%
Obesity 36.6% 21.9%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 5.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Ho ho kus

  • More residents in Sterling heights report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 11.2% in Ho ho kus.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 25.5% compared to 16.6% in Ho ho kus.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 19.8% compared to 6.9% in Ho ho kus.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Ho ho kus at 19.6% compared to 17.7% in Sterling heights.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sterling heights at 36.6% compared to 21.9% in Ho ho kus.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 5.0% in Ho ho kus.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling heights Ho ho kus
No Schooling 2.4% (3,134) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 18.8% (24,937) 2.8% (117)
Less than High School 16.6% (22,008) 2.0% (83)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (29,518) 51.4% (2,167)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Ho ho kus

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Ho ho kus.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 2.8% in Ho ho kus.
  • More residents in Sterling heights have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 2.0% in Ho ho kus.
  • In Ho ho kus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 22.3% in Sterling heights.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.