Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Hickory, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Hickory, NC.

Data Sterling heights Hickory
Population 132,567 44,084
Median Age 41.2 years 37.9 years
Median Income $75,381 $58,251
Married Families 45.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 8% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 4.3

Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Hickory

  • In Sterling heights, the population is higher at 132,567, compared to 44,084 in Hickory.
  • Residents in Sterling heights have a higher median age of 41.2 years compared to 37.9 years in Hickory.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381 compared to $58,251 in Hickory.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling heights at 45.0% compared to 35.0% in Hickory.
  • The poverty level is higher in Hickory at 12%, compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Sterling heights is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.3% in Hickory.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling heights vs Hickory provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling heights Hickory
Black 6 13
White 79 62
Asian 9 4
Hispanic 2 13
Two or More Races 4 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Hickory

  • In Hickory, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 6% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 62% in Hickory.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sterling heights at 9% compared to 4% in Hickory.
  • Hickory has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hickory at 7%, compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • In Hickory, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sterling heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling heights Hickory
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 12.3%
Depression 25.5% 24.8%
Smoking 19.8% 18.1%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 17.2%
Obesity 36.6% 37.7%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Hickory

  • More residents in Sterling heights report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.1% in Hickory.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 25.5% compared to 24.8% in Hickory.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 19.8% compared to 18.1% in Hickory.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 17.2% in Hickory.
  • Hickory has higher obesity rates at 37.7% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Hickory.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling heights Hickory
No Schooling 2.4% (3,134) 0.7% (306)
High School Diploma 18.8% (24,937) 13.1% (5,797)
Less than High School 16.6% (22,008) 11.4% (5,022)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (29,518) 24.0% (10,580)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Hickory

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.7% in Hickory.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 13.1% in Hickory.
  • More residents in Sterling heights have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 11.4% in Hickory.
  • In Hickory, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.0% compared to 22.3% in Sterling heights.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.