Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Hampton, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Hampton, VA.

Data Sterling heights Hampton
Population 132,567 138,037
Median Age 41.2 years 36.5 years
Median Income $75,381 $64,430
Married Families 45.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 8% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 3.7

Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Hampton

  • The population in Hampton is higher at 138,037, compared to 132,567 in Sterling heights.
  • Residents in Sterling heights have a higher median age of 41.2 years compared to 36.5 years in Hampton.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381 compared to $64,430 in Hampton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling heights at 45.0% compared to 34.0% in Hampton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Hampton at 12%, compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Sterling heights is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.7% in Hampton.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling heights vs Hampton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling heights Hampton
Black 6 49
White 79 34
Asian 9 2
Hispanic 2 7
Two or More Races 4 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Hampton

  • In Hampton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 6% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 34% in Hampton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sterling heights at 9% compared to 2% in Hampton.
  • Hampton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hampton at 8%, compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sterling heights and Hampton at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling heights Hampton
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 11.3%
Depression 25.5% 21.1%
Smoking 19.8% 17.7%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 15.2%
Obesity 36.6% 42.6%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Hampton

  • More residents in Sterling heights report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.8% in Hampton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 25.5% compared to 21.1% in Hampton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 19.8% compared to 17.7% in Hampton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 15.2% in Hampton.
  • Hampton has higher obesity rates at 42.6% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hampton at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling heights Hampton
No Schooling 2.4% (3,134) 0.7% (1,033)
High School Diploma 18.8% (24,937) 16.8% (23,123)
Less than High School 16.6% (22,008) 7.0% (9,612)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (29,518) 18.5% (25,602)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Hampton

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.7% in Hampton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 16.8% in Hampton.
  • More residents in Sterling heights have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 7.0% in Hampton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 18.5% in Hampton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.