Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Greenville, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Greenville, MS.

Data Sterling heights Greenville
Population 132,567 28,017
Median Age 41.2 years 38.7 years
Median Income $75,381 $35,148
Married Families 45.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 8% 30%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 5.8

Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Greenville

  • In Sterling heights, the population is higher at 132,567, compared to 28,017 in Greenville.
  • Residents in Sterling heights have a higher median age of 41.2 years compared to 38.7 years in Greenville.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381 compared to $35,148 in Greenville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling heights at 45.0% compared to 25.0% in Greenville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Greenville at 30%, compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • Greenville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.7% in Sterling heights.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling heights vs Greenville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling heights Greenville
Black 6 87
White 79 11
Asian 9 1
Hispanic 2 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Greenville

  • In Greenville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 87% compared to 6% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 11% in Greenville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sterling heights at 9% compared to 1% in Greenville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sterling heights at 2% compared to 0% in Greenville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sterling heights at 4% compared to 1% in Greenville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sterling heights and Greenville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling heights Greenville
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 19.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 16.3%
Depression 25.5% 21.2%
Smoking 19.8% 26.7%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 10.6%
Obesity 36.6% 46.0%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 28.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Greenville

  • In Greenville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 25.5% compared to 21.2% in Greenville.
  • Greenville has a higher smoking rate at 26.7% compared to 19.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 10.6% in Greenville.
  • Greenville has higher obesity rates at 46.0% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Greenville at 28.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling heights Greenville
No Schooling 2.4% (3,134) 1.8% (501)
High School Diploma 18.8% (24,937) 20.2% (5,661)
Less than High School 16.6% (22,008) 15.5% (4,352)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (29,518) 14.5% (4,052)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Greenville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.8% in Greenville.
  • In Greenville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 18.8% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents in Sterling heights have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 15.5% in Greenville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 14.5% in Greenville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.