Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Cranston, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Cranston, RI.
| Data | Sterling heights | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 132,567 | 82,421 |
| Median Age | 41.2 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $75,381 | $83,123 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Cranston
- In Sterling heights, the population is higher at 132,567, compared to 82,421 in Cranston.
- Residents in Sterling heights have a higher median age of 41.2 years compared to 39.9 years in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123, compared to $75,381 in Sterling heights.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling heights at 45.0% compared to 37.0% in Cranston.
- The poverty level is identical in both Sterling heights and Cranston at 8%.
- The unemployment rate in Sterling heights is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.5% in Cranston.
Demographics
Demographics Sterling heights vs Cranston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sterling heights | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 5 |
| White | 79 | 61 |
| Asian | 9 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Cranston
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sterling heights at 6% compared to 5% in Cranston.
- Sterling heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 61% in Cranston.
- The Asian population is larger in Sterling heights at 9% compared to 7% in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cranston at 9%, compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sterling heights and Cranston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sterling heights | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 19.8% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 29.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Cranston
- More residents in Sterling heights report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.1% in Cranston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 25.5% compared to 24.9% in Cranston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 19.8% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cranston at 18.6% compared to 17.7% in Sterling heights.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sterling heights at 36.6% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Cranston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sterling heights | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (3,134) | 1.1% (930) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (24,937) | 16.1% (13,246) |
| Less than High School | 16.6% (22,008) | 13.4% (11,048) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (29,518) | 24.7% (20,330) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Cranston
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.1% in Cranston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 16.1% in Cranston.
- More residents in Sterling heights have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 13.4% in Cranston.
- In Cranston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 22.3% in Sterling heights.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.