Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Costa mesa, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Costa mesa, CA.

Data Sterling heights Costa mesa
Population 132,567 109,521
Median Age 41.2 years 36.4 years
Median Income $75,381 $104,981
Married Families 45.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 8% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 3.6

Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Costa mesa

  • In Sterling heights, the population is higher at 132,567, compared to 109,521 in Costa mesa.
  • Residents in Sterling heights have a higher median age of 41.2 years compared to 36.4 years in Costa mesa.
  • Costa mesa has a higher median income of $104,981, compared to $75,381 in Sterling heights.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling heights at 45.0% compared to 36.0% in Costa mesa.
  • The poverty level is higher in Costa mesa at 9%, compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Sterling heights is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.6% in Costa mesa.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling heights vs Costa mesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling heights Costa mesa
Black 6 1
White 79 40
Asian 9 9
Hispanic 2 37
Two or More Races 4 12
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Costa mesa

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sterling heights at 6% compared to 1% in Costa mesa.
  • Sterling heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 40% in Costa mesa.
  • Both Sterling heights and Costa mesa have the same percentage of Asian residents at 9%.
  • Costa mesa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Costa mesa at 12%, compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • In Costa mesa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sterling heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling heights Costa mesa
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 10.4%
Depression 25.5% 18.5%
Smoking 19.8% 10.9%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 17.1%
Obesity 36.6% 27.6%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Costa mesa

  • More residents in Sterling heights report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.2% in Costa mesa.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 25.5% compared to 18.5% in Costa mesa.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 19.8% compared to 10.9% in Costa mesa.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 17.1% in Costa mesa.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sterling heights at 36.6% compared to 27.6% in Costa mesa.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Costa mesa.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling heights Costa mesa
No Schooling 2.4% (3,134) 1.8% (2,006)
High School Diploma 18.8% (24,937) 11.3% (12,406)
Less than High School 16.6% (22,008) 17.3% (18,969)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (29,518) 31.2% (34,140)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Costa mesa

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.8% in Costa mesa.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 11.3% in Costa mesa.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Costa mesa at 17.3%, compared to 16.6% in Sterling heights.
  • In Costa mesa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.2% compared to 22.3% in Sterling heights.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.