Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Copperas cove, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Copperas cove, TX.

Data Sterling heights Copperas cove
Population 132,567 37,964
Median Age 41.2 years 31.7 years
Median Income $75,381 $64,798
Married Families 45.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 8% 11%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 4.8

Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Copperas cove

  • In Sterling heights, the population is higher at 132,567, compared to 37,964 in Copperas cove.
  • Residents in Sterling heights have a higher median age of 41.2 years compared to 31.7 years in Copperas cove.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381 compared to $64,798 in Copperas cove.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling heights at 45.0% compared to 38.0% in Copperas cove.
  • The poverty level is higher in Copperas cove at 11%, compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • Copperas cove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.7% in Sterling heights.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling heights vs Copperas cove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling heights Copperas cove
Black 6 15
White 79 47
Asian 9 2
Hispanic 2 19
Two or More Races 4 17
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Copperas cove

  • In Copperas cove, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 6% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 47% in Copperas cove.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sterling heights at 9% compared to 2% in Copperas cove.
  • Copperas cove has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Copperas cove at 17%, compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sterling heights and Copperas cove at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling heights Copperas cove
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 12.0%
Depression 25.5% 24.9%
Smoking 19.8% 18.3%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 17.8%
Obesity 36.6% 41.6%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Copperas cove

  • More residents in Sterling heights report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.6% in Copperas cove.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 25.5% compared to 24.9% in Copperas cove.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 19.8% compared to 18.3% in Copperas cove.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Copperas cove at 17.8% compared to 17.7% in Sterling heights.
  • Copperas cove has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Copperas cove at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling heights Copperas cove
No Schooling 2.4% (3,134) 0.5% (200)
High School Diploma 18.8% (24,937) 12.8% (4,867)
Less than High School 16.6% (22,008) 6.8% (2,567)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (29,518) 12.5% (4,756)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Copperas cove

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.5% in Copperas cove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 12.8% in Copperas cove.
  • More residents in Sterling heights have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 6.8% in Copperas cove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 12.5% in Copperas cove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.