Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Clifton hill, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Clifton hill, MO.

Data Sterling heights Clifton hill
Population 132,567 87
Median Age 41.2 years 28.3 years
Median Income $75,381 $45,500
Married Families 45.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 8% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 3.5

Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Clifton hill

  • In Sterling heights, the population is higher at 132,567, compared to 87 in Clifton hill.
  • Residents in Sterling heights have a higher median age of 41.2 years compared to 28.3 years in Clifton hill.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381 compared to $45,500 in Clifton hill.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling heights at 45.0% compared to 31.0% in Clifton hill.
  • The poverty level is higher in Clifton hill at 10%, compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Sterling heights is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.5% in Clifton hill.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling heights vs Clifton hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling heights Clifton hill
Black 6 Data is updating
White 79 94
Asian 9 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Clifton hill

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sterling heights at 6% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Clifton hill at 94% compared to 79% in Sterling heights.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sterling heights at 9% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sterling heights at 2% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clifton hill at 6%, compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sterling heights and Clifton hill at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling heights Clifton hill
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 17.9%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 14.3%
Depression 25.5% 25.9%
Smoking 19.8% 21.4%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 16.0%
Obesity 36.6% 41.6%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Clifton hill

  • In Clifton hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Clifton hill at 25.9% versus 25.5% in Sterling heights.
  • Clifton hill has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 19.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 16.0% in Clifton hill.
  • Clifton hill has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Clifton hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling heights Clifton hill
No Schooling 2.4% (3,134) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 18.8% (24,937) 26.4% (23)
Less than High School 16.6% (22,008) 13.8% (12)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (29,518) 3.4% (3)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Clifton hill

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Clifton hill.
  • In Clifton hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.4% compared to 18.8% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents in Sterling heights have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 13.8% in Clifton hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 3.4% in Clifton hill.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.