Demographics details for Stearns, KY vs Yakima, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stearns, KY vs Yakima, WA.
Data | Stearns | Yakima |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,224 | 97,012 |
Median Age | 48.0 years | 33.9 years |
Median Income | $38,333 | $55,734 |
Married Families | 52.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Stearns vs Yakima
- The population in Yakima is higher at 97,012, compared to 1,224 in Stearns.
- Residents in Stearns have a higher median age of 48.0 years compared to 33.9 years in Yakima.
- Yakima has a higher median income of $55,734, compared to $38,333 in Stearns.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Stearns at 52.0% compared to 33.0% in Yakima.
- The poverty level is higher in Yakima at 16%, compared to 12% in Stearns.
- Yakima has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 4.5% in Stearns.
Demographics
Demographics Stearns vs Yakima provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Stearns | Yakima |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 99 | 34 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 47 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Stearns vs Yakima
- In Yakima, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Stearns.
- Stearns has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 34% in Yakima.
- In Yakima, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Stearns.
- Yakima has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 47%, compared to 0% in Stearns.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yakima at 16%, compared to 1% in Stearns.
- In Yakima, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Stearns.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Stearns | Yakima |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 23.5% | 18.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 19.0% | 14.7% |
Depression | 32.6% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 30.8% | 17.4% |
Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 15.4% |
Obesity | 43.4% | 39.7% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stearns vs Yakima
- More residents in Stearns report poor mental health at 23.5% compared to 18.5% in Yakima.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stearns at 32.6% compared to 23.6% in Yakima.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stearns at 30.8% compared to 17.4% in Yakima.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Yakima at 15.4% compared to 13.4% in Stearns.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stearns at 43.4% compared to 39.7% in Yakima.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stearns at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Yakima.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Stearns | Yakima |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.8% (1,748) |
High School Diploma | 21.6% (264) | 13.4% (12,983) |
Less than High School | 20.1% (246) | 27.9% (27,106) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.5% (214) | 12.1% (11,743) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stearns vs Yakima
- In Yakima, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Stearns.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stearns hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 13.4% in Yakima.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yakima at 27.9%, compared to 20.1% in Stearns.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stearns hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.5% compared to 12.1% in Yakima.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.