Demographics details for Stearns, KY vs Clifton hill, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Stearns, KY vs Clifton hill, MO.

Data Stearns Clifton hill
Population 1,224 87
Median Age 48.0 years 28.3 years
Median Income $38,333 $45,500
Married Families 52.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Stearns vs Clifton hill

  • In Stearns, the population is higher at 1,224, compared to 87 in Clifton hill.
  • Residents in Stearns have a higher median age of 48.0 years compared to 28.3 years in Clifton hill.
  • Clifton hill has a higher median income of $45,500, compared to $38,333 in Stearns.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Stearns at 52.0% compared to 31.0% in Clifton hill.
  • Stearns has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Clifton hill.
  • The unemployment rate in Stearns is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Clifton hill.

Demographics

Demographics Stearns vs Clifton hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Stearns Clifton hill
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 99 94
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races 1 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Stearns vs Clifton hill

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Stearns and Clifton hill at 0%.
  • Stearns has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 94% in Clifton hill.
  • Both Stearns and Clifton hill have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Stearns and Clifton hill at 0%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clifton hill at 6%, compared to 1% in Stearns.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stearns and Clifton hill at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Stearns Clifton hill
Mental Health Not Good 23.5% 17.9%
Physical Health Not Good 19.0% 14.3%
Depression 32.6% 25.9%
Smoking 30.8% 21.4%
Binge Drinking 13.4% 16.0%
Obesity 43.4% 41.6%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Stearns vs Clifton hill

  • More residents in Stearns report poor mental health at 23.5% compared to 17.9% in Clifton hill.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Stearns at 32.6% compared to 25.9% in Clifton hill.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Stearns at 30.8% compared to 21.4% in Clifton hill.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Clifton hill at 16.0% compared to 13.4% in Stearns.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Stearns at 43.4% compared to 41.6% in Clifton hill.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Stearns at 20.0% compared to 6.0% in Clifton hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Stearns Clifton hill
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 21.6% (264) 26.4% (23)
Less than High School 20.1% (246) 13.8% (12)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.5% (214) 3.4% (3)

Education Levels Comparison: Stearns vs Clifton hill

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Stearns and Clifton hill at 0.0%.
  • In Clifton hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.4% compared to 21.6% in Stearns.
  • More residents in Stearns have less than a high school education at 20.1% compared to 13.8% in Clifton hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Stearns hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.5% compared to 3.4% in Clifton hill.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.