Demographics details for Staunton, VA vs Rio grande city, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Staunton, VA vs Rio grande city, TX.

Data Staunton Rio grande city
Population 25,904 15,269
Median Age 41.0 years 30.2 years
Median Income $59,731 $44,307
Married Families 35.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 10% 30%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 5.2

Population Comparison: Staunton vs Rio grande city

  • In Staunton, the population is higher at 25,904, compared to 15,269 in Rio grande city.
  • Residents in Staunton have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 30.2 years in Rio grande city.
  • Staunton has a higher median income of $59,731 compared to $44,307 in Rio grande city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Staunton at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Rio grande city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Rio grande city at 30%, compared to 10% in Staunton.
  • Rio grande city has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.0% in Staunton.

Demographics

Demographics Staunton vs Rio grande city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Staunton Rio grande city
Black 11 Data is updating
White 79 -38
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 4 95
Two or More Races 5 43
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Staunton vs Rio grande city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Staunton at 11% compared to 0% in Rio grande city.
  • Staunton has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to -38% in Rio grande city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Staunton at 1% compared to 0% in Rio grande city.
  • Rio grande city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 95%, compared to 4% in Staunton.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rio grande city at 43%, compared to 5% in Staunton.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Staunton and Rio grande city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Staunton Rio grande city
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 20.2%
Physical Health Not Good 10.6% 19.6%
Depression 24.3% 22.7%
Smoking 16.3% 22.5%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 13.8%
Obesity 35.2% 45.5%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Staunton vs Rio grande city

  • In Rio grande city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 16.8% in Staunton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Staunton at 24.3% compared to 22.7% in Rio grande city.
  • Rio grande city has a higher smoking rate at 22.5% compared to 16.3% in Staunton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Staunton at 17.5% compared to 13.8% in Rio grande city.
  • Rio grande city has higher obesity rates at 45.5% compared to 35.2% in Staunton.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Staunton and Rio grande city at 15.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Staunton Rio grande city
No Schooling 0.6% (163) 2.7% (419)
High School Diploma 17.4% (4,506) 14.7% (2,247)
Less than High School 9.5% (2,465) 36.0% (5,498)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.8% (6,161) 10.8% (1,654)

Education Levels Comparison: Staunton vs Rio grande city

  • In Rio grande city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.6% in Staunton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Staunton hold a high school diploma at 17.4% compared to 14.7% in Rio grande city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rio grande city at 36.0%, compared to 9.5% in Staunton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Staunton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 10.8% in Rio grande city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.