Demographics details for Staunton, VA vs Corydon, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Staunton, VA vs Corydon, IN.
Data | Staunton | Corydon |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,904 | 3,164 |
Median Age | 41.0 years | 41.7 years |
Median Income | $59,731 | $54,125 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Staunton vs Corydon
- In Staunton, the population is higher at 25,904, compared to 3,164 in Corydon.
- The median age in Corydon is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 41.0 years in Staunton.
- Staunton has a higher median income of $59,731 compared to $54,125 in Corydon.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Staunton at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Corydon.
- The poverty level is higher in Corydon at 12%, compared to 10% in Staunton.
- Corydon has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Staunton.
Demographics
Demographics Staunton vs Corydon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Staunton | Corydon |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 3 |
White | 79 | 90 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Staunton vs Corydon
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Staunton at 11% compared to 3% in Corydon.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Corydon at 90% compared to 79% in Staunton.
- The Asian population is larger in Staunton at 1% compared to 0% in Corydon.
- Corydon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Staunton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Staunton at 5% compared to 1% in Corydon.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Staunton and Corydon at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Staunton | Corydon |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 12.0% |
Depression | 24.3% | 25.8% |
Smoking | 16.3% | 20.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 35.2% | 37.9% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Staunton vs Corydon
- In Corydon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 16.8% in Staunton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Corydon at 25.8% versus 24.3% in Staunton.
- Corydon has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 16.3% in Staunton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Corydon at 17.8% compared to 17.5% in Staunton.
- Corydon has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 35.2% in Staunton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Corydon at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Staunton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Staunton | Corydon |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (163) | 2.5% (78) |
High School Diploma | 17.4% (4,506) | 27.4% (867) |
Less than High School | 9.5% (2,465) | 14.4% (455) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (6,161) | 14.7% (464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Staunton vs Corydon
- In Corydon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.6% in Staunton.
- In Corydon, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.4% compared to 17.4% in Staunton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Corydon at 14.4%, compared to 9.5% in Staunton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Staunton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 14.7% in Corydon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.