Demographics details for State line, MS vs Spartanburg, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in State line, MS vs Spartanburg, SC.
Data | State line | Spartanburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 458 | 38,584 |
Median Age | 34.0 years | 35.5 years |
Median Income | $38,529 | $49,140 |
Married Families | 61.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: State line vs Spartanburg
- The population in Spartanburg is higher at 38,584, compared to 458 in State line.
- The median age in Spartanburg is higher at 35.5 years, compared to 34.0 years in State line.
- Spartanburg has a higher median income of $49,140, compared to $38,529 in State line.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in State line at 61.0% compared to 28.0% in Spartanburg.
- State line has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 15% in Spartanburg.
- Spartanburg has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 5.5% in State line.
Demographics
Demographics State line vs Spartanburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | State line | Spartanburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 97 | 45 |
White | 3 | 44 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: State line vs Spartanburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in State line at 97% compared to 45% in Spartanburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spartanburg at 44% compared to 3% in State line.
- In Spartanburg, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in State line.
- Spartanburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in State line.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spartanburg at 4%, compared to 0% in State line.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both State line and Spartanburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | State line | Spartanburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 13.2% |
Depression | 20.9% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 20.0% | 20.1% |
Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 41.8% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 32.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: State line vs Spartanburg
- In Spartanburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.8% in State line.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spartanburg at 22.9% versus 20.9% in State line.
- Spartanburg has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 20.0% in State line.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Spartanburg at 13.8% compared to 13.5% in State line.
- Obesity rates are higher in State line at 41.8% compared to 38.5% in Spartanburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in State line at 32.0% compared to 15.0% in Spartanburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | State line | Spartanburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (384) |
High School Diploma | 55.9% (256) | 15.9% (6,118) |
Less than High School | 28.8% (132) | 11.2% (4,339) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.1% (19) | 21.3% (8,205) |
Education Levels Comparison: State line vs Spartanburg
- In Spartanburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in State line.
- A higher percentage of residents in State line hold a high school diploma at 55.9% compared to 15.9% in Spartanburg.
- More residents in State line have less than a high school education at 28.8% compared to 11.2% in Spartanburg.
- In Spartanburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 4.1% in State line.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.