Demographics details for Starkville, MS vs Whitehall, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Starkville, MS vs Whitehall, WI.
Data | Starkville | Whitehall |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,168 | 1,632 |
Median Age | 27.0 years | 36.8 years |
Median Income | $36,076 | $56,894 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 27% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Starkville vs Whitehall
- In Starkville, the population is higher at 24,168, compared to 1,632 in Whitehall.
- The median age in Whitehall is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 27.0 years in Starkville.
- Whitehall has a higher median income of $56,894, compared to $36,076 in Starkville.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Starkville and Whitehall at 30.0%.
- Starkville has a higher poverty level at 27% compared to 7% in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Starkville.
Demographics
Demographics Starkville vs Whitehall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Starkville | Whitehall |
---|---|---|
Black | 34 | 1 |
White | 58 | 83 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Starkville vs Whitehall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Starkville at 34% compared to 1% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Whitehall at 83% compared to 58% in Starkville.
- The Asian population is larger in Starkville at 4% compared to 0% in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 2% in Starkville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Whitehall at 3%, compared to 2% in Starkville.
- In Whitehall, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Starkville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Starkville | Whitehall |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 10.3% |
Depression | 20.3% | 24.0% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 16.7% |
Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 24.4% |
Obesity | 44.8% | 34.9% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Starkville vs Whitehall
- More residents in Starkville report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.2% in Whitehall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Whitehall at 24.0% versus 20.3% in Starkville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Starkville at 18.5% compared to 16.7% in Whitehall.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Whitehall at 24.4% compared to 13.8% in Starkville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Starkville at 44.8% compared to 34.9% in Whitehall.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Whitehall at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Starkville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Starkville | Whitehall |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (321) | 0.4% (7) |
High School Diploma | 9.4% (2,276) | 24.4% (398) |
Less than High School | 6.8% (1,655) | 15.7% (256) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (6,345) | 8.6% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Starkville vs Whitehall
- A higher percentage of residents in Starkville have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Whitehall.
- In Whitehall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 9.4% in Starkville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Whitehall at 15.7%, compared to 6.8% in Starkville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Starkville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 8.6% in Whitehall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.