Environment details: Starksboro VT
Good quality; healthy metrics established.
Environment details: Clinton SC
Good quality; managed effectively.
Compare Environment: Starksboro VT vs Clinton SC
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Starksboro | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 45 | 555 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Good quality; healthy metrics established. | Good quality; managed effectively. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.65 | 1.54 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 17 | 21 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Starksboro vs Clinton
- Water quality is rated higher in Starksboro at 7/10 compared to 6/10 in Clinton.
- The median air quality index is lower (worse) in Starksboro at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Clinton.
- The average air quality index is worse in Starksboro with 1.65 compared to 1.54 in Clinton.
- Clinton experiences more days with poor air quality at 21 compared to 17 in Starksboro.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.