Demographics details for Starke, FL vs Mc graw, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Starke, FL vs Mc graw, NY.
| Data | Starke | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,864 | 994 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 32.0 years |
| Median Income | $42,976 | $60,781 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Starke vs Mc graw
- In Starke, the population is higher at 5,864, compared to 994 in Mc graw.
- Residents in Starke have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 32.0 years in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher median income of $60,781, compared to $42,976 in Starke.
- In Mc graw, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 25.0% in Starke.
- Starke has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 7% in Mc graw.
- The unemployment rate in Starke is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.5% in Mc graw.
Demographics
Demographics Starke vs Mc graw provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Starke | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 26 | Data is updating |
| White | 66 | 88 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Starke vs Mc graw
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Starke at 26% compared to 0% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mc graw at 88% compared to 66% in Starke.
- The Asian population is larger in Starke at 1% compared to 0% in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Starke.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mc graw at 8%, compared to 7% in Starke.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Starke and Mc graw at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Starke | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 26.7% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 38.8% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Starke vs Mc graw
- More residents in Starke report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.2% in Mc graw.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mc graw at 25.5% versus 21.0% in Starke.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Starke at 26.7% compared to 18.6% in Mc graw.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mc graw at 19.1% compared to 14.7% in Starke.
- Obesity rates are higher in Starke at 38.8% compared to 37.3% in Mc graw.
- Disability percentages are higher in Starke at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Mc graw.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Starke | Mc graw |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (3) | 0.3% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 21.8% (1,278) | 27.1% (269) |
| Less than High School | 12.6% (740) | 15.1% (150) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (475) | 8.8% (87) |
Education Levels Comparison: Starke vs Mc graw
- In Mc graw, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Starke.
- In Mc graw, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 21.8% in Starke.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mc graw at 15.1%, compared to 12.6% in Starke.
- In Mc graw, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.8% compared to 8.1% in Starke.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.