Demographics details for Starke, FL vs Farmington, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Starke, FL vs Farmington, MN.
Data | Starke | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,864 | 23,566 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $42,976 | $114,737 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Starke vs Farmington
- The population in Farmington is higher at 23,566, compared to 5,864 in Starke.
- The median age is the same in both Starke and Farmington at 35.1 years.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $114,737, compared to $42,976 in Starke.
- In Farmington, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 25.0% in Starke.
- Starke has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Farmington.
- The unemployment rate in Starke is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.2% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Starke vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Starke | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Black | 26 | 3 |
White | 66 | 85 |
Asian | 1 | 3 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Starke vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Starke at 26% compared to 3% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 85% compared to 66% in Starke.
- In Farmington, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Starke.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Starke.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Starke at 7% compared to 4% in Farmington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Starke and Farmington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Starke | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 13.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 8.2% |
Depression | 21.0% | 22.6% |
Smoking | 26.7% | 13.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 38.8% | 31.8% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Starke vs Farmington
- More residents in Starke report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Farmington at 22.6% versus 21.0% in Starke.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Starke at 26.7% compared to 13.7% in Farmington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Farmington at 18.9% compared to 14.7% in Starke.
- Obesity rates are higher in Starke at 38.8% compared to 31.8% in Farmington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Starke at 17.0% compared to 6.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Starke | Farmington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (3) | 0.4% (86) |
High School Diploma | 21.8% (1,278) | 11.3% (2,674) |
Less than High School | 12.6% (740) | 7.1% (1,662) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (475) | 23.4% (5,505) |
Education Levels Comparison: Starke vs Farmington
- In Farmington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Starke.
- A higher percentage of residents in Starke hold a high school diploma at 21.8% compared to 11.3% in Farmington.
- More residents in Starke have less than a high school education at 12.6% compared to 7.1% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 8.1% in Starke.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.