Demographics details for Stanton, CA vs Sabin, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stanton, CA vs Sabin, MN.
| Data | Stanton | Sabin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 38,952 | 610 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 33.3 years |
| Median Income | $76,123 | $118,750 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Stanton vs Sabin
- In Stanton, the population is higher at 38,952, compared to 610 in Sabin.
- Residents in Stanton have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 33.3 years in Sabin.
- Sabin has a higher median income of $118,750, compared to $76,123 in Stanton.
- In Sabin, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 36.0% in Stanton.
- The poverty level is identical in both Stanton and Sabin at 0%.
- The unemployment rate in Stanton is higher at 4.3%, compared to 2.5% in Sabin.
Demographics
Demographics Stanton vs Sabin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stanton | Sabin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 8 | 82 |
| Asian | 26 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 52 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Stanton vs Sabin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stanton at 2% compared to 0% in Sabin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sabin at 82% compared to 8% in Stanton.
- The Asian population is larger in Stanton at 26% compared to 1% in Sabin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Stanton at 52% compared to 3% in Sabin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Stanton at 11% compared to 8% in Sabin.
- In Sabin, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 1% in Stanton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stanton | Sabin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 13.0% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 20.6% |
| Obesity | 28.4% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stanton vs Sabin
- More residents in Stanton report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 14.2% in Sabin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sabin at 25.3% versus 17.0% in Stanton.
- Sabin has a higher smoking rate at 15.3% compared to 13.0% in Stanton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sabin at 20.6% compared to 14.3% in Stanton.
- Sabin has higher obesity rates at 33.7% compared to 28.4% in Stanton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stanton at 10.0% compared to 5.0% in Sabin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stanton | Sabin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.9% (1,532) | 0.2% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (5,904) | 14.1% (86) |
| Less than High School | 31.4% (12,250) | 3.6% (22) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (5,475) | 17.9% (109) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stanton vs Sabin
- A higher percentage of residents in Stanton have no formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 0.2% in Sabin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stanton hold a high school diploma at 15.2% compared to 14.1% in Sabin.
- More residents in Stanton have less than a high school education at 31.4% compared to 3.6% in Sabin.
- In Sabin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 14.1% in Stanton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.