Demographics details for Stanton, CA vs Cleveland heights, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Stanton, CA vs Cleveland heights, OH.

Data Stanton Cleveland heights
Population 38,952 44,201
Median Age 37.4 years 36.7 years
Median Income $76,123 $69,155
Married Families 36.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 4.6

Population Comparison: Stanton vs Cleveland heights

  • The population in Cleveland heights is higher at 44,201, compared to 38,952 in Stanton.
  • Residents in Stanton have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 36.7 years in Cleveland heights.
  • Stanton has a higher median income of $76,123 compared to $69,155 in Cleveland heights.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Stanton at 36.0% compared to 33.0% in Cleveland heights.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cleveland heights at 13%, compared to 0% in Stanton.
  • Cleveland heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.3% in Stanton.

Demographics

Demographics Stanton vs Cleveland heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Stanton Cleveland heights
Black 2 42
White 8 46
Asian 26 5
Hispanic 52 3
Two or More Races 11 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Stanton vs Cleveland heights

  • In Cleveland heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 2% in Stanton.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cleveland heights at 46% compared to 8% in Stanton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Stanton at 26% compared to 5% in Cleveland heights.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Stanton at 52% compared to 3% in Cleveland heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Stanton at 11% compared to 4% in Cleveland heights.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Stanton at 1% compared to 0% in Cleveland heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Stanton Cleveland heights
Mental Health Not Good 15.9% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% 10.9%
Depression 17.0% 21.8%
Smoking 13.0% 16.0%
Binge Drinking 14.3% 16.7%
Obesity 28.4% 34.5%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Stanton vs Cleveland heights

  • More residents in Stanton report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 15.7% in Cleveland heights.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cleveland heights at 21.8% versus 17.0% in Stanton.
  • Cleveland heights has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Stanton.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cleveland heights at 16.7% compared to 14.3% in Stanton.
  • Cleveland heights has higher obesity rates at 34.5% compared to 28.4% in Stanton.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cleveland heights at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Stanton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Stanton Cleveland heights
No Schooling 3.9% (1,532) 0.4% (157)
High School Diploma 15.2% (5,904) 9.5% (4,183)
Less than High School 31.4% (12,250) 3.7% (1,638)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.1% (5,475) 39.6% (17,513)

Education Levels Comparison: Stanton vs Cleveland heights

  • A higher percentage of residents in Stanton have no formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 0.4% in Cleveland heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Stanton hold a high school diploma at 15.2% compared to 9.5% in Cleveland heights.
  • More residents in Stanton have less than a high school education at 31.4% compared to 3.7% in Cleveland heights.
  • In Cleveland heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.6% compared to 14.1% in Stanton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.