Environment details: Stanchfield MN
Water quality acceptable; no major pollution sources.
Environment details: Jersey city NJ
Good quality; urban water programs effective.
Compare Environment: Stanchfield MN vs Jersey city NJ
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Stanchfield | Jersey city |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 665 | 713 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Water quality acceptable; no major pollution sources. | Good quality; urban water programs effective. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.6 | 2.18 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 17 | 106 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Stanchfield vs Jersey city
- The water quality in Jersey city is superior at 7/10 compared to 6/10 in Stanchfield.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Jersey city with an average index of 2.18 compared to 1.6 in Stanchfield.
- Jersey city experiences more days with poor air quality at 106 compared to 17 in Stanchfield.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.