Demographics details for Stanardsville, VA vs Washington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stanardsville, VA vs Washington, NC.
| Data | Stanardsville | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 355 | 10,828 |
| Median Age | 42.2 years | 48.0 years |
| Median Income | $60,833 | $38,927 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Stanardsville vs Washington
- The population in Washington is higher at 10,828, compared to 355 in Stanardsville.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 42.2 years in Stanardsville.
- Stanardsville has a higher median income of $60,833 compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Stanardsville at 54.0% compared to 34.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 16%, compared to 10% in Stanardsville.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.5% in Stanardsville.
Demographics
Demographics Stanardsville vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stanardsville | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 49 |
| White | 64 | 41 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Stanardsville vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 12% in Stanardsville.
- Stanardsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 64% compared to 41% in Washington.
- Both Stanardsville and Washington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Stanardsville at 11% compared to 6% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Stanardsville at 13% compared to 3% in Washington.
- In Washington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Stanardsville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stanardsville | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stanardsville vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 18.0% in Stanardsville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stanardsville at 24.1% compared to 22.8% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 18.5% in Stanardsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stanardsville at 16.5% compared to 14.7% in Washington.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 36.7% in Stanardsville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 24.0% compared to 23.0% in Stanardsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stanardsville | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 8.7% (31) | 1.2% (128) |
| High School Diploma | 27.9% (99) | 19.0% (2,058) |
| Less than High School | 28.7% (102) | 13.7% (1,487) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.6% (98) | 10.3% (1,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stanardsville vs Washington
- A higher percentage of residents in Stanardsville have no formal schooling at 8.7% compared to 1.2% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stanardsville hold a high school diploma at 27.9% compared to 19.0% in Washington.
- More residents in Stanardsville have less than a high school education at 28.7% compared to 13.7% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stanardsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.6% compared to 10.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.