Demographics details for Stanardsville, VA vs Potts camp, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Stanardsville, VA vs Potts camp, MS.

Data Stanardsville Potts camp
Population 355 409
Median Age 42.2 years 45.6 years
Median Income $60,833 $21,845
Married Families 54.0% 20.0%
Poverty Level 10% 25%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Stanardsville vs Potts camp

  • The population in Potts camp is higher at 409, compared to 355 in Stanardsville.
  • The median age in Potts camp is higher at 45.6 years, compared to 42.2 years in Stanardsville.
  • Stanardsville has a higher median income of $60,833 compared to $21,845 in Potts camp.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Stanardsville at 54.0% compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
  • The poverty level is higher in Potts camp at 25%, compared to 10% in Stanardsville.
  • Potts camp has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Stanardsville.

Demographics

Demographics Stanardsville vs Potts camp provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Stanardsville Potts camp
Black 12 13
White 64 80
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 11 Data is updating
Two or More Races 13 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Stanardsville vs Potts camp

  • In Potts camp, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 12% in Stanardsville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Potts camp at 80% compared to 64% in Stanardsville.
  • Both Stanardsville and Potts camp have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Stanardsville at 11% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Stanardsville at 13% compared to 7% in Potts camp.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stanardsville and Potts camp at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Stanardsville Potts camp
Mental Health Not Good 18.0% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 13.0%
Depression 24.1% 23.0%
Smoking 18.5% 21.7%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 13.8%
Obesity 36.7% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Stanardsville vs Potts camp

  • More residents in Stanardsville report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.4% in Potts camp.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Stanardsville at 24.1% compared to 23.0% in Potts camp.
  • Potts camp has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 18.5% in Stanardsville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Stanardsville at 16.5% compared to 13.8% in Potts camp.
  • Potts camp has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 36.7% in Stanardsville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Stanardsville at 23.0% compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Stanardsville Potts camp
No Schooling 8.7% (31) 0.5% (2)
High School Diploma 27.9% (99) 13.7% (56)
Less than High School 28.7% (102) 12.0% (49)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 27.6% (98) 8.1% (33)

Education Levels Comparison: Stanardsville vs Potts camp

  • A higher percentage of residents in Stanardsville have no formal schooling at 8.7% compared to 0.5% in Potts camp.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Stanardsville hold a high school diploma at 27.9% compared to 13.7% in Potts camp.
  • More residents in Stanardsville have less than a high school education at 28.7% compared to 12.0% in Potts camp.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Stanardsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.6% compared to 8.1% in Potts camp.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.