Demographics details for Stanardsville, VA vs Klamath falls, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Stanardsville, VA vs Klamath falls, OR.

Data Stanardsville Klamath falls
Population 355 21,977
Median Age 42.2 years 35.1 years
Median Income $60,833 $46,695
Married Families 54.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 10% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Stanardsville vs Klamath falls

  • The population in Klamath falls is higher at 21,977, compared to 355 in Stanardsville.
  • Residents in Stanardsville have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
  • Stanardsville has a higher median income of $60,833 compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Stanardsville at 54.0% compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Klamath falls at 18%, compared to 10% in Stanardsville.
  • Klamath falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Stanardsville.

Demographics

Demographics Stanardsville vs Klamath falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Stanardsville Klamath falls
Black 12 1
White 64 69
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 11 15
Two or More Races 13 11
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Stanardsville vs Klamath falls

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stanardsville at 12% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Klamath falls at 69% compared to 64% in Stanardsville.
  • In Klamath falls, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Stanardsville.
  • Klamath falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 11% in Stanardsville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Stanardsville at 13% compared to 11% in Klamath falls.
  • In Klamath falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Stanardsville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Stanardsville Klamath falls
Mental Health Not Good 18.0% 20.2%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 13.4%
Depression 24.1% 28.4%
Smoking 18.5% 19.9%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 15.8%
Obesity 36.7% 35.9%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Stanardsville vs Klamath falls

  • In Klamath falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.0% in Stanardsville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Klamath falls at 28.4% versus 24.1% in Stanardsville.
  • Klamath falls has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 18.5% in Stanardsville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Stanardsville at 16.5% compared to 15.8% in Klamath falls.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Stanardsville at 36.7% compared to 35.9% in Klamath falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Stanardsville at 23.0% compared to 20.0% in Klamath falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Stanardsville Klamath falls
No Schooling 8.7% (31) 0.9% (192)
High School Diploma 27.9% (99) 16.0% (3,508)
Less than High School 28.7% (102) 15.5% (3,401)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 27.6% (98) 14.4% (3,175)

Education Levels Comparison: Stanardsville vs Klamath falls

  • A higher percentage of residents in Stanardsville have no formal schooling at 8.7% compared to 0.9% in Klamath falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Stanardsville hold a high school diploma at 27.9% compared to 16.0% in Klamath falls.
  • More residents in Stanardsville have less than a high school education at 28.7% compared to 15.5% in Klamath falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Stanardsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.6% compared to 14.4% in Klamath falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.