Demographics details for Stamford, CT vs Social circle, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Stamford, CT vs Social circle, GA.

Data Stamford Social circle
Population 136,188 5,265
Median Age 37.6 years 36.8 years
Median Income $100,718 $68,333
Married Families 38.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 9% 10%
Unemployment Rate 2.6 3.5

Population Comparison: Stamford vs Social circle

  • In Stamford, the population is higher at 136,188, compared to 5,265 in Social circle.
  • Residents in Stamford have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 36.8 years in Social circle.
  • Stamford has a higher median income of $100,718 compared to $68,333 in Social circle.
  • In Social circle, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 38.0% in Stamford.
  • The poverty level is higher in Social circle at 10%, compared to 9% in Stamford.
  • Social circle has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.6% in Stamford.

Demographics

Demographics Stamford vs Social circle provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Stamford Social circle
Black 19 31
White 33 67
Asian 7 Data is updating
Hispanic 30 2
Two or More Races 11 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Stamford vs Social circle

  • In Social circle, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 19% in Stamford.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Social circle at 67% compared to 33% in Stamford.
  • The Asian population is larger in Stamford at 7% compared to 0% in Social circle.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Stamford at 30% compared to 2% in Social circle.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Stamford at 11% compared to 0% in Social circle.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stamford and Social circle at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Stamford Social circle
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% 18.1%
Physical Health Not Good 8.9% 13.0%
Depression 17.1% 22.4%
Smoking 11.2% 19.5%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 15.3%
Obesity 25.1% 38.3%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Stamford vs Social circle

  • In Social circle, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 13.4% in Stamford.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Social circle at 22.4% versus 17.1% in Stamford.
  • Social circle has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 11.2% in Stamford.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Stamford at 16.1% compared to 15.3% in Social circle.
  • Social circle has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 25.1% in Stamford.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Social circle at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Stamford.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Stamford Social circle
No Schooling 1.6% (2,214) 0.7% (39)
High School Diploma 12.0% (16,291) 16.6% (872)
Less than High School 15.0% (20,422) 8.8% (462)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 35.7% (48,639) 17.4% (914)

Education Levels Comparison: Stamford vs Social circle

  • A higher percentage of residents in Stamford have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.7% in Social circle.
  • In Social circle, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 12.0% in Stamford.
  • More residents in Stamford have less than a high school education at 15.0% compared to 8.8% in Social circle.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Stamford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 17.4% in Social circle.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.